Exception 2, Regarding Remedial Measures.Exception 3, Regarding Acceptance of Responsibility.Factors 2 and 4: The Respondent's Experience Dispensing Controlled Substances and Compliance With Federal, State, and Local Law.Public Interest Determination: The Standard.Recommended Rulings, Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Decision of the Administrative Law Judge This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links Headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents. This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the Provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts. Rendition of the daily Federal Register on does not Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML Legal research should verify their results against an official edition of The official SGML-based PDF version on, those relying on it for The material on is accurately displayed, consistent with While every effort has been made to ensure that Regulatory information on with the objective ofĮstablishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.įor complete information about, and access to, our official publications Informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal This prototype edition of theĭaily Federal Register on will remain an unofficial Each document posted on the site includes a link to theĬorresponding official PDF file on. The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official It is not an official legal edition of the Federal Promising practices include integrating PDMPs into electronic health record (EHR) systems, permitting physicians to delegate PDMP access to other allied health professionals in their office (e.g., physician assistants and nurse practitioners), and streamlining the process for providers to register with the PDMP.Ĭontinued state-level evaluation of PDMPs can lead to greater identification and implementation of promising practices.This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the dailyįederal Register. States have taken a number of steps to make PDMPs easier to use and access. PDMPs can also be used to send “proactive” reports to authorized users to protect patients at the highest risk and identify inappropriate prescribing trends. As a public health tool, PDMPs can be used by state health departments to understand the behavior of the epidemic and inform and evaluate interventions. PDMPs are more than just passive databases. Timely data, like in a “real-time” PDMP, maximizes the utility of the prescription history data, with significant implications for patient safety and public health. If there is a long interval between dispensing and submission into the state PDMP, providers and other PDMP users will not have information on patients’ most recent prescriptions. However, pharmacies submit this data to state PDMPs at varying intervals-ranging from monthly to daily or even in “real-time,” i.e., under five minutes. When pharmacists dispense controlled substances to patients, they have to enter the prescription into the state PDMP. Some states have implemented polices that require providers to check a state PDMP prior to prescribing certain controlled substances and in certain circumstances, and these policies have significant potential for ensuring that the utility and promise of PDMPs are maximized. However, a PDMP is only useful to health care providers if they check the system before prescribing. PDMPs are promising tools for health care providers to see patients’ prescribing histories to inform their prescribing decisions.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |